World Science Database
Home Scientists Abstracts Books Events Journals Experiments Topics Index More Find Login
Scientists Interests Profession Websites Notables Countries World Map Recent Memorials Memorial More


Sam Micheal

View count: 756
Micheal, Salvatore Gerard     (Easy Link: http://www.worldsci.org/people/Salvatore_Micheal)
Independent Researcher

Topics: Particle_Physics
Interests: Elastic-impeding Space-time, Temporal Curvature, Elastic Deformations, Particle Physics, Unification
Nationality: usa
Member since: 2008
Definitions:
inertia:traditionally has been defined as a resistance to a change in motion but i define it as the lack of energy in relativistic curvature, curvature is essentially a temporal distortion which we experience as mass(2015-02-04 09:19:23)


Related Websites:
Laser Assisted Pinched Fiel...


Experiments:
2 Conjoined Experiments to Disprove Virtual Particles
3 Experiments to Test EDST

Books:
N and Omega

Abstracts Online:
2008Assumptions for the EDST (Elastic Deformations in Space-Time) Model of Elementary Particles

Event Attendence:
2011-08-13Y-Bias and Angularity: The Dynamics of Self-Organizing CriticalityVideo Conference
2011-08-06Science, Objectivity, the Scientific Method, the Standard Model, and the Other ModelVideo Conference
2011-07-30The Scientific WorldviewVideo Conference
2011-07-16Motions of Observable Structures Ruled by Hierarchical Two-body Gravitation in the UniverseVideo Conference
2011-06-25The New Face of GravityVideo Conference
2011-03-19Beyond Euler: Simple Geometry Unifying Vectors, Scalars and Complex NumbersVideo Conference
2010-11-19Gravity GroupVideo Conference
2010-09-04How God Made AtomsVideo Conference
2009-04-12Expanding Earth / We are Currently in the Middle of a Major Scientific RevolutionVideo Conference
2009-03-29BSM - Supegravitation Unified Theory - A New Approach in PhysicsVideo Conference

Biography

http://www.nowpublic.com/health/recap-motivations

a recap of motivations

For those who missed my several papers citing relevant references, let's recap them so it's absolutely clear there are solid motivations for 'spacelet theory', an engineering approach toward modeling elementary particles and interactions.

  1. Guillaume Adenier disproved Bell's theorem allowing local realistic models to be considered to explain quantum phenomena.

  2. GR, a cornerstone of modern physics, asserts spacetime is bent/distorted by gravitating bodies.

  3. Bernard Shutz, director of the Astrophysical Relativity Department of the Max Planck Institute, has understood gravitation may be viewed as curved time only.

  4. Engineers have always known two facts:

    a. any media must have elasticity to stretch/deform

    b. any media must have impedance to impede electromagnetic waves

  5. And so, spacetime/time must possess elasticity and impedance.

  6. This is no mystery to engineers: they identify 'the impedance of space' as approximately 377 ohms derivable from the 'ideal transmission line' POV.

  7. Similarly, 'the elasticity of space' can be calculated and is around 10^22 newtons.

  8. But as implied above, the simpler theory (as preferred by Occam) is that these attributes are associated with time alone, leaving space to be Euclidean and flat.

  9. It is well known wavelets provide one of the most powerful techniques for analyzing complex data; as i write, wavelets are literally transforming science and engineering.

  10. What perhaps is not so well known is that there is an 'uncertainty principle' associated with wavelet theory; this 'wavelet uncertainty principle' bears alarming resemblance to Heisenberg's.

  11. We may take this as coincidence with no relevance to quantum physics..

  12. Or we may take this 'coincidence' as a hint about elementary particles..

Some may view this 'chain of logic' above as pure speculation embodying 'fringe' ideas.. But the sequence above may lead to the simplest, deepest, most appropriate and profound view of matter/energy since Einstein's famous equation.. Spacelet, spacetime wavelet, theory may be the 'paradigm shift' required in physics to achieve 'unification' (the quest to unify forces of nature in a coherent and consistent framework). The beauty of this perspective should be immediately obvious: we do it all in 3D+1 dimensions.

Another 'bonus' in this framework is that electromagnetism must be mediated by something real, something identifiable, something precisely describable in terms of spacelets: charged antiphotons. The exact properties and shapes must be worked out but preliminary indicators are encouraging. The motivation for proposing something so ludicrous sounding is not simply the need for something real to mediate e-m; we need to consider what may be the core principle in our universe: conservation of curvature.

Why do we 'need' this principle? Very simple and practical: we observe spacetime to be flat (or very nearly so) and so any physical processes (such as nuclear fusion or fission) must preserve this 'flatness'. Otherwise, we would observe the curvature of our universe to change over time.. So from observations of curvature alone, we deduce this core principle: curvature conservation.

All nuclear reactions (and more) must obey this principle: fusion, fission, pair-production, and perhaps most importantly ? photon absorption/emission. Every time a photon is created/destroyed/absorbed/emitted, so must an antiphoton. If photons have very slight positive temporal curvature, then antiphotons must have very slight negative temporal curvature. This is NOT negative energy; it is opposites in temporal curvature. To visualize this, we know time slows down near massive bodies.. We identify this as positive temporal curvature. Near antimatter, time speeds up (NOT reversed time as Dirac proposed) .. So this framework is fully deterministic, local, and REAL.

.. The problems with conventional approaches toward quantum mechanics is that they're explicitly UNREAL, non-local, and inherently random. This is essentially why they will never develop an accurate model of gravitation based on virtual exchange; ?nature don't operate that way?.

Einstein's dream was to find a coherent and consistent framework (from a realistic POV) to describe quantum phenomena but he was at a disadvantage in his time: wavelet theory had not been developed and physics was pulling away from 'the aether' as a description of space. So anything currently resembling 'the aether' (such as 'the impedance of space') is currently automatically rejected by convention as 'sheer nonsense'. This is an example of the 'politics of science' NOT science.

A true scientist considers things objectively, even-handedly, and unbiased-ly. A true scientist does not dismiss based on ?sounds like the aether to me?.. A true scientist will consider viable alternatives.

Spacelet theory, admittedly in its infancy, combined with the conservation of curvature principle, may be the simplest most realistic framework possibleand we automatically reject it 'cuz it ?sounds like the aether to me?? That don't float in my boat.

After 100 years, let's get real physics and fulfill Einstein's dream.

.. A presentation scheduled for August 6th will be delivered to the Natural Philosophy Alliance by sam micheal aka sam iam. The website announcing upcoming presentations is here:

http://www.worldsci.org/php/index.php?tab0=Events&tab1=Coming

Please attend and be a part positive change.

Resources for the meeting follow:

https://www.msu.edu/~micheal/NPA-sgm-presentation.ppt


https://www.msu.edu/~micheal/feynman-quote.pdf


https://www.msu.edu/~micheal/fund-e-p.pdf


https://www.msu.edu/~micheal/NPA-part2.ppt


https://www.msu.edu/~micheal/NPA-part3.ppt


 


Experiments by Salvatore Gerard Micheal

3 Experiments to Test EDST
by Sam Micheal
 
Type:Experiment
Status:Proposed
Purpose:to test the edst (elastic deformations in space-time) model of elementary particles
2 Conjoined Experiments to Disprove Virtual Particles
by Sam Micheal
 
Type:Experiment
Status:Proposed
Purpose:Invalidate virtual particle interaction model by finding evidence to support non-virtual interaction.
Outcome:Expected outcome: somewhat tight spectrum of emitted wavelengths associated with bar permanent magnets - and - a more rapid temperature increase (of water sample) associated with magnet vs non-magnetic iron bar.

Books by Salvatore Gerard Micheal



View count: 906
N and Omega

by Sam Micheal

Pages: 76
Publisher: scribd.com


Read it now online

Description

This book is intended for a general audience interested in science, physics, or unification physics. It is intended to be readable and enjoyable. The author frequently makes fun of science, physics, and himself ? so please read with an open mind!

About the author:

SG Micheal was formally educated in statistics, psychology, and systems science at Michigan State University. He also has graduate level education in nuclear, mechanical, and electrical engineering from various other institutions. He has written several books on physics and systems.

About the theory:

This theory has been developing for about twenty-five years in fits-and-starts. It has matured to a point in need ? to reach a broader audience. It is not sophisticated mathematically but based on an engineering perspective ? with elements rooted in established and accepted engineering principles.

About the title:

N is for Newton, the SI unit of force; ? is for ohm, the SI unit of resistance. Z0, the impedance of space, has units in ohms; Y0, the elasticity of space, has units in newtons. Other than dimensionality, these are the only two qualities of space-time.


Papers by Sam Micheal



Assumptions for the EDST (Elastic Deformations in Space-Time) Model of Elementary Particles

(2008)

Sam Micheal

Keywords: elastic, deformation, space, time, elementary, particle, temporal, curvature, onion

Lookup: space (104), time (100), particle (38), elastic (2), elementary (23), curvature (4)

Abstract:


hotmail iniciar sesion hotmail inicio de sesion