Sam Micheal View count: 756 
Independent Researcher Topics: Particle_Physics Interests: Elasticimpeding Spacetime, Temporal Curvature, Elastic Deformations, Particle Physics, Unification Nationality: usa Member since: 2008
Related Websites:
Biography http://www.nowpublic.com/health/recapmotivations a recap of motivations For those who missed my several papers citing relevant references, let's recap them so it's absolutely clear there are solid motivations for 'spacelet theory', an engineering approach toward modeling elementary particles and interactions.
Some may view this 'chain of logic' above as pure speculation embodying 'fringe' ideas.. But the sequence above may lead to the simplest, deepest, most appropriate and profound view of matter/energy since Einstein's famous equation.. Spacelet, spacetime wavelet, theory may be the 'paradigm shift' required in physics to achieve 'unification' (the quest to unify forces of nature in a coherent and consistent framework). The beauty of this perspective should be immediately obvious: we do it all in 3D+1 dimensions. Another 'bonus' in this framework is that electromagnetism must be mediated by something real, something identifiable, something precisely describable in terms of spacelets: charged antiphotons. The exact properties and shapes must be worked out but preliminary indicators are encouraging. The motivation for proposing something so ludicrous sounding is not simply the need for something real to mediate em; we need to consider what may be the core principle in our universe: conservation of curvature. Why do we 'need' this principle? Very simple and practical: we observe spacetime to be flat (or very nearly so) and so any physical processes (such as nuclear fusion or fission) must preserve this 'flatness'. Otherwise, we would observe the curvature of our universe to change over time.. So from observations of curvature alone, we deduce this core principle: curvature conservation. All nuclear reactions (and more) must obey this principle: fusion, fission, pairproduction, and perhaps most importantly ? photon absorption/emission. Every time a photon is created/destroyed/absorbed/emitted, so must an antiphoton. If photons have very slight positive temporal curvature, then antiphotons must have very slight negative temporal curvature. This is NOT negative energy; it is opposites in temporal curvature. To visualize this, we know time slows down near massive bodies.. We identify this as positive temporal curvature. Near antimatter, time speeds up (NOT reversed time as Dirac proposed) .. So this framework is fully deterministic, local, and REAL. .. The problems with conventional approaches toward quantum mechanics is that they're explicitly UNREAL, nonlocal, and inherently random. This is essentially why they will never develop an accurate model of gravitation based on virtual exchange; ?nature don't operate that way?. Einstein's dream was to find a coherent and consistent framework (from a realistic POV) to describe quantum phenomena but he was at a disadvantage in his time: wavelet theory had not been developed and physics was pulling away from 'the aether' as a description of space. So anything currently resembling 'the aether' (such as 'the impedance of space') is currently automatically rejected by convention as 'sheer nonsense'. This is an example of the 'politics of science' NOT science. A true scientist considers things objectively, evenhandedly, and unbiasedly. A true scientist does not dismiss based on ?sounds like the aether to me?.. A true scientist will consider viable alternatives. Spacelet theory, admittedly in its infancy, combined with the conservation of curvature principle, may be the simplest most realistic framework possibleand we automatically reject it 'cuz it ?sounds like the aether to me?? That don't float in my boat. After 100 years, let's get real physics and fulfill Einstein's dream. .. A presentation scheduled for August 6^{th }will be delivered to the Natural Philosophy Alliance by sam micheal aka sam iam. The website announcing upcoming presentations is here: http://www.worldsci.org/php/index.php?tab0=Events&tab1=Coming Please attend and be a part positive change. Resources for the meeting follow:
https://www.msu.edu/~micheal/NPAsgmpresentation.ppt https://www.msu.edu/~micheal/feynmanquote.pdf https://www.msu.edu/~micheal/fundep.pdf https://www.msu.edu/~micheal/NPApart2.ppt https://www.msu.edu/~micheal/NPApart3.ppt

3 Experiments to Test EDST by Sam Micheal

2 Conjoined Experiments to Disprove Virtual Particles by Sam Micheal

View count: 906 
N and Omega by Sam Micheal Pages: 76 Publisher: scribd.com Read it now online Description This book is intended for a general audience interested in science, physics, or unification physics. It is intended to be readable and enjoyable. The author frequently makes fun of science, physics, and himself ? so please read with an open mind! About the author: SG Micheal was formally educated in statistics, psychology, and systems science at About the theory: This theory has been developing for about twentyfive years in fitsandstarts. It has matured to a point in need ? to reach a broader audience. It is not sophisticated mathematically but based on an engineering perspective ? with elements rooted in established and accepted engineering principles. About the title: N is for Newton, the SI unit of force; ? is for ohm, the SI unit of resistance. Z_{0}, the impedance of space, has units in ohms; Y_{0}, the elasticity of space, has units in newtons. Other than dimensionality, these are the only two qualities of spacetime. 
(2008) Sam Micheal Keywords: elastic, deformation, space, time, elementary, particle, temporal, curvature, onion Lookup: space (104), time (100), particle (38), elastic (2), elementary (23), curvature (4)
