Dialog or Monologues?
This web page
CNPS has got a good tool for dialog between members with this web page. We have seen very good contributions from Harry and Nick. They have analyzed Einstein’s theories and demonstrated many errors. This a very good start and a help for convincing our members about the many errors produced by Einstein. We should be grateful to Nick and Harry for this work of them.
Einstein’s errors can also be refuted by realizing that his theories are not physics at all but rather a very, very bad philosophy. This follows from the absurdities in the basic assumptions, using Maxwell’s ether theory without the assumed ether and also by explaining gravity as a bending of nothing and caused by geometric relations. This is the shorter way of refuting Einstein but of course we need the longer versions as well. However, monologues are not enough and we should use David’s tool for dialog also. This is urgent since many members only advocate own ideas without commenting on what other members have stated. Reviewing the work of others means cooperation and more cooperation is certainly needed in CNPS.
The Need for a Dialog
The reasoning in mainstream is based on emotions more than on logic. They are therefore willing to change opinion only due to a ready and complete theory. This causes a moment 22 situation.
The conclusion that time dilation does not exist means that, according to GPS, we must have a clock dilation. Harry and Nick have not explained that effect. I have suggested a solution based on the ether wind having an effect on bound electrons. This is described in Light without Energy. The article has not got much response.
Another idea is gravity as an effect of the ether wind. This means a falling ether that also can explain the Pioneer anomaly. In this ether model the reference for light speed is not a frame but a spherically symmetric field. The first order effect of vertical or horizontal ether wind can be tested by a scaled down version of de Witte’s method based on 2 HeNe lasers with high frequency stability. In this theory light travels down faster than up as I stated in The Too-General Theory of Relativity in Galilean Electrodynamics 10.4 in 1999. More details are available in The Falling Ether.
A third very important item is the irrelevance of the ether wind inside a wave front. In my opinion the component of the ether wind falling inside a wave front has relevance only in focused light detected by amplitude. In interferometers and in laser cavities wave fronts are defined by phase due to parallel mirrors and moving these mirrors inside their own planes cannot change behavior of light as Stokes said. In telescopes wave fronts are detected by phase and therefore also independent of transverse ether wind. Therefore real motion of light is observable only in focused light and in other cases we detect the normal to the wave fronts. These 2 concepts coincide in the frame (field) of the ether. This is described in The empirical background behind relativity in Physics Essays 23.4 and in The special theory of relativity and the Sagnac Effect in NPA Proc for 2007. Wave front bending is instead produced by the gradient in longitudinal ether wind. We can conclude that we get no tilting of wave fronts in transverse arm in MMX as Stokes said and no information about ether wind in stellar aberration.
A fourth example of questions needing more debate is the anomalies in gravity observed by 3 different methods during solar eclipses.
A fifth example of interest is the idea that energy interchange between electrons and light can be misunderstood. In my opinion light only intermediates in a process where electrons exchange energy with the ether. This cannot be decided by direct observations since ether and light in itself are both not observable. All information comes from the electrons. More information is found in Light without Energy.
Some readers may think that remarkable ideas are presented here. However, that is just what we should expect regarding a difficult enigma present for many decades. Without an ether we cannot solve this problem. We must search knowledge by looking at anomalies.
If you have ideas regarding the following concepts
- clock dilation due to ether wind
- gravity due to ether wind
- wave front bending due to longitudinal ether wind
- gravity anomalies due to ether wind
- energy interchange with the ether
than you can write a comment below on this web page.