Enter the content which will be displayed in sticky bar
John Erik Persson
  • Home
  • Affiliates
    • Community
  • Login
  • Register

Euclide's Mistakes

John Chappell Natural Philsophy Alliance > John Erik Persson > Mathematics > Euclide’s Mistakes

Euclide’s Mistakes

Jun 21, 2018John-Erik PerssonMathematics, Philosophy0 Comment

The fifth postulate

In Euclid’s geometry, regarding a plane, he uses the concepts point and straight line. He postulates, that a point and a straight line together can define a unique straight line, parallel to the given line and passing through the given point. However, he never provided a proof for this postulate – the fifth postulate.

Euclid’s definition

Not parallel lines have one common point. Euclid tried to define parallel lines by a negation of this statement. Double negation (not not parallel) is problematic in definitions, and not one common point means, either zero or at least 2, common points. Here Euclid made a small error, by not observing the second alternative. At least 2 points means not separated parallelism. Therefore, Euclid defines only the first kind of (separated) parallelism. We could say: parallel lines either never meet or never separate; but this is 2 definitions. Euclid avoided this small mistake, by stating that the given point must be outside the given line.

However, more important is, that Euclid made a large and devastating error also, when he made a definition that was based on a point that did not exist. Euclid’s definition is therefore useless.

Another definition

We need one definition – not two. A simple, and clear, definition is to state that, parallel lines have constant separation. Separation means distance along a line in a right angle to one of the lines. By allowing separation to include the value zero we get one definition, and we do not have to cover up for Euclid’s small mistake, by demanding the given point to be outside the given line.

If we substitute parallelism with constant separation, and combine that with the fact that 2 points define a unique straight line, we get a possibility to prove the fifth postulate.

Conclusions

  • Euclid defined parallelism by using a point that did not exist.
  • We can have a simple and clear definition of parallelism by stating that parallelism means constant separation.

Remarks

  • According to the definition of parallelism given here: 2 circles can be parallel, if they are concentric.
  • It seems uncertain whether Euclid should be regarded as author, or as editor, of his work The Elements.

John-Erik Persson

 

Written by John-Erik Persson

Leave a Reply

Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

← The Confusion in Physics
Einstein Was Wrong – Who Was Right? →

Affiliations

The John Chappell Natural Philosophy Society The Natural Philosophers Community

Recent Posts

  • The sad story of quantum gravity
  • Mathematics is powerful and dangerous
  • Decontamination of physics
  • Gravity does not move!
  • The illusion of time dilation, Big Bang and Pioneer anomaly

Archives

  • June 2023
  • September 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • April 2022
  • August 2021
  • March 2021
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • January 2019
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • May 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • June 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • March 2015

Categories

  • Aether
  • Directors
  • Gravity
  • Light
  • Mathematics
  • Members
  • Philosophy
  • Physics
  • Relativity
  • Space-Time
  • Time
  • Uncategorized
  • Wave Particle Duality
© Copyright - 2013 : All Rights Reserved.
Powered by WordPress & Designed by Aivahthemes
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Dribbble
  • LinkedIn