Member

Presented are the results of an in-depth investigative analysis conducted to determine the relationship between stellar aberration and the principle of relative motion. Introduced are two new principles of physics that were discovered during the process. The first of these principles involves the Lorentz factor and its inherent relationship to the principle of stellar aberration. The second involves the newly defined principle of distance perspective that integrates the principle of inverse stellar aberration with the principle of relative motion.

A long awaited common sense explanation of relativistic time dilation and associated distance contraction is presented. The straightforward approach leads immediately to the light speed effect that correlates the principle of light aberration with the principle that light speed is unaffected by the speed of the source. The subsequent unification of other related relativistic principles including the transverse Doppler Effect is clearly demonstrated for the first time.

An evidence supported analysis of the true nature of light propagation is presented. Introduced is a new principle of physics that closes the gap between the classical and relativistic principles of both physics and cosmology and proves beyond reasonable doubt the relativistic nature of light propagation.

Exhaustive in-depth investigative analyses over a seven year period have resulted in a final breakthrough that completely integrates all of the principles of relativistic velocity and acceleration composition. Deriving and presenting the complete list of the eight resulting formulas in as brief a manner as possible is the sole purpose of this paper.

The fundamental nature of superluminal speeds in millennium relativity velocity composition is revealed for the first time. Higher order velocity composition is also covered including the postulation of the root speed theorem involved in superluminal speeds of all orders of velocity composition. The new theorem makes possible the determination of the maximum superluminal speeds for all orders of velocity composition from the first order to infinity.

More than ten years of research analysis involving the fundamental principles of classical and relativistic physics has convinced the author that an expanded theory of relativistic physics is now possible. Such expanded theory will integrate both classical and relativistic principles beyond their presently established relationships. To simplify treatment of the envisioned theoretical model and thereby facilitate understanding, the subject will be divided into a series of short papers, each focused on a specific aspect of the complete model. With that as the primary objective, the present paper will concentrate on the light speed barrier and show that although the barrier is real in one sense, it is false in another that considers all of the factors regarding the achievable speeds of objects undergoing acceleration. It will be further shown that, in principle at least, there appears to be no theoretical limit as to how many times the speed of light can be exceeded relative to any given frame of reference.

An analysis is presented showing the complete relationship between Einstein?s E = Mc² energy equation and Newton?s F = ma inertial force equation. During the analysis the reasons why this relationship had not been established sooner is made clear. The present work takes the relationships between energy and force developed over a series of previous works by this author and finalizes them in a comprehensive treatment that includes new discoveries not previously shown.

Many experiments intended to either verify or disprove the relativistic transverse Doppler effect are conducted at 90? detection angles using high frequency waves at distances of less than one wavelength between the detector and the source. Yet in the utilization of research conducted by this author for previous works involving the transverse Doppler effect it is found that for the frequencies typically used, the special relativity defined transverse Doppler effect is invalid at distances less than approximately 28 wavelengths between the source and detector. Until this present work, even the Millennium Relativity formulas for the transverse Doppler effect were valid only down to a distance of one wavelength between source and detector. In resolution of this limitation, new formulas will now be introduced that are valid from 0? to 180? for the relativistic transverse Doppler effect down to a distance between source and detector reaching zero.

A thorough examination of the fundamental principles of inertial and gravitational kinetics is performed to discover the underlying relational characteristics of the two different physical behaviors. By isolating the specific behavioral characteristics of inertia and gravity into the four kinetic states that appear to define such behaviors it is possible to compare the two forces in precise detail and determine the fundamental underlying nature of the relationships that exist between them. The results of such examination as presented in this work provides conditional support for Newton?s universal law of gravitation based on such relational comparison but fails to support the inertial gravitational equivalence principle of Einstein?s general theory of relativity. Another aspect of the general theory, the warping of space time by massive bodies, is left untouched for the present time. A final consequence of the discoveries presented is the formulation of time based and distance based Newtonian and relativistic mathematical programming models for gravitational acceleration that provide powerful new analytical tools for use in future investigations.

An in-depth analysis is presented that succeeds in establishing what appears to be the true relationship of the relativistic Lorentz transformations to the relativistic transverse Doppler effect for electromagnetic energy propagating space. The purpose of the investigation was to determine the precise underlying nature of these two effects in order to clear away the confusion presently associated with their relationship to the constancy of light speed. In the process of successfully accomplishing these initial objectives a revised version of a previously introduced formula for the relativistic transverse Doppler effect is fully validated and a previously identified discrepancy in the special relativity formulas is confirmed along with other irregularities in the present treatment. The final outcome of this latest research is a new understanding of relativistic motion mechanics and energy propagation at the most fundamental levels of physics. This improved understanding suggests new approaches to problem solving regarding not only the kinetics of motion but also the treatment of time and space in future investigations.

Presented in this work are the four fundamental cases involving the integration of relativistic velocity and acceleration composition principles made obvious by the two preceding millennium relativity works on velocity composition and acceleration composition. Through systematic analysis it is clearly demonstrated that the fundamental nature of unidirectional motion and acceleration is accurately definable in a newly introduced relativistic coordinate system. It is further shown that velocity composition is fundamentally a Y-axis consideration of this new coordinate system and acceleration composition is fundamentally an X-axis consideration. Taken together in their integrated form, the principles presented here provide the entire mathematical basis for all fundamental relativistic compositional behavior involving uniform motion and acceleration.

Investigative analysis of Kepler?s laws of planetary motion lead to the revelation that Newton?s laws of mechanics are incomplete and improperly correlated with his universal law of gravitation. It is subsequently shown that even Galileo?s discovery that all objects fall at the same rate is only conditionally true. Ironically, it is Newton?s modification of Kepler?s third law of planetary motion that provided the insights leading to these discoveries, including the required modification of Newton?s universal law of gravitation. During the ensuing formalization process, Newton?s laws of mechanics are expanded as required, and correctly incorporated into an expanded version of the universal law of gravitation. The newly interpreted, and properly correlated laws are concurrently and subsequently validated through mathematical analysis and found to be in full agreement with Kepler?s laws, and consistent with Newton?s, and Einstein?s earlier determined fundamental principles of equivalence involving gravitational and inertial forces. The broad extent by which the physical, and astronomical, sciences are affected by this work gives evidence of the fundamental nature of the discoveries presented.

Presented are the results of a four-month research effort to determine the underlying causes of motion related relativistic time variance. The purpose of the research was to examine this phenomenon at the most fundament level possible and to derive an explanation that is not only consistent with the evidence that supports time variance, but is also consistent with common sense, logic, and reason. It is the author?s opinion that all scientific theories must ultimately submit to such intellectual reconciliation before they can be truly accepted as established scientific doctrine that all reasonable individuals will find unobjectionable. This is not the case at present, and aside from the dissidents, even those scientists who profess agreement with such abstract concepts as time variance are at a loss to explain away the many apparent contradictions such concepts impose on the intellect. In the process of unraveling this mystery, three new outstanding inadequacies of the present system of scientific methodology are identified. These include the failure to properly incorporate the fundamental principles of perspective with regard to motion and acceleration, an incorrect understanding of the principles of motion and acceleration, and a poorly devised mathematical convention regarding relativistic physics in general. These newly discovered obstacles to progress in the physical sciences are in addition to the incorrect acceleration formulas previously discovered and corrected in the earlier millennium relativity works involving energy.

The relativistic principles developed throughout the six preceding millennium works are applied in the investigation of the relativistic behavior of compound speeds involving both, the instantaneous speeds associated with constant acceleration and the constant speeds associated with uniform motion. The resulting findings of the investigation resolve the contradiction between the two opposing theories, millennium and special relativity, on velocity composition. In the process, the validity of the millennium formula is confirmed, new formulas are derived for the compounded speeds of acceleration, and the special relativity formula is shown to be incorrect except in special cases involving acceleration and not uniform motion as stipulated in Einstein?s theory.

Presented is a theory in fundamental theoretical physics that establishes the relationship between time and energy, and also the relationship between inertia and gravity. This theory abandons the concept that mass increases as a result of relativistic motion and shows instead that the extra energy related to an object undergoing such motion is a direct result of the affect that the slowing of time has on velocity. In support of this premise, new formulas are introduced for acceleration and used in conjunction with a relativistic time transformation factor to develop new equations for both kinetic and total energy that replace those of special relativity. These and subsequently derived equations for momentum, distance, acceleration, inertia, gravity, and others, establish a direct relationship between the presented theory and the principles of an earlier theory, the millennium theory of relativity. A final consequence of this theoretical analysis is the discovery of two new laws of physics involving acceleration, and the realization that a unified theory of physics is now possible.

Presented are the results of a yearlong research project regarding relativistic velocity composition. The purpose of the research was to evaluate every reasonable theoretical approach that might explain this process, including Einstein?s velocity composition law, and determine what formula correctly defines its behavior. Pursuant to that goal, Einstein?s formula is dissected and deciphered in a manner that has never been successfully accomplished before. The results are not pretty, and upon seeing them, one will find it impossible to continue believing that Einstein?s formula can be correct. Among the other surprising findings presented here, are these: That which appears to be the correct formula is so different from what would have been expected that it shakes the entire foundation of relativistic physics. It is also found that the velocity composition process is immensely more important than presently realized. Whereas Einstein?s formula, discounting its apparent invalidity, essentially concludes special relativity causing it to be a closed loop theory, the new formula links the properly defined underlying principles of relativity to an entirely new and unexplored level of relativistic physics. Astonishingly, a level that not only removes the light-speed barrier but possibly provides insights into many of our recent discoveries regarding the true nature of the universe.

The Millennium Theory of Relativity is a fundamental theory in relativistic physics. Through methodical analysis of the evidence, strong and convincing arguments are developed in opposition to those of special relativity. Specifically, the evidence supporting the constancy of light speed is accepted, and with it the self-evident proposition that the Laws of physics are the same in all inertial systems. Yet, it is shown that the apparent relationship of these two entities cannot be properly reconciled without the introduction of spherical reference frames. Only then, can a correct understanding of relativistic principles be achieved, and this understanding is substantially different from that previously arrived at. The evolving principles of the new theory will clearly demonstrate that many of the assumptions of the presiding theory are untenable.

Although it will be shown that time is affected by relative motion, other associated effects are different from those of currently held beliefs. Distances in space for example, and the size of objects it contains, are not really affected by such motion. In fact, the principle of time variance is contingent upon precisely that condition. Whereas actual distances are unaffected, however, the distance light travels in an interval of time, is affected, and this effect on distance is not limited to the direction of motion. The shrinking distance traveled by light within a moving frame of reference occurs equally in all directions. This change of view, is consistent with the prevailing evidence, yet has a profound bearing on the way the physical laws of nature are perceived.

Another consequence of the undertaken analysis is the realization that the Lorentz formulas are not direct representations of the principles of relativistic behavior. Even though these formulas yield correct mathematical results, by the very nature of their indirectness they tend to be misleading. It is contended, that these formulas together with the rectangular reference frames they are normally associated with, led to the misunderstandings embodied in special relativity. It is further argued, that only by use of the spherical reference frames and the directly derived equations developed in the presented analysis, is a proper understanding possible.

A final consequence of the ensuing analysis in this present work is a somewhat different view of the relativistic, transverse, Doppler effect. Comparison of the different results reveals yet another possible flaw in the presiding theory. This is not to say that additional flaws might not surface in a future supplemental work involving mass and energy.

Presented is a theory in fundamental theoretical physics that establishes the relationship between time and energy. This theory abandons the concept that mass is directly affected by relativistic motion and shows instead, that the energy related to an object undergoing such motion is a direct result of the effect time expansion has on velocity. In support of this concept, new equations are introduced for both kinetic and total energy that replace those of special relativity. Subsequent equations for momentum, distance, and acceleration are then derived that establish a direct link between the time and energy theory and the principles of an earlier theory, the millennium theory of relativity. A final consequence of this theoretical analysis is the discovery of a new Law of physics, ?the Law of acceleration,? given in the order of its discovery.

Presented is a theory in fundamental theoretical physics that establishes the relationships between time, velocity, and the rate of acceleration for all material objects. When properly formulated as given in this work, these relationships establish what appear to be two new natural laws of physics. These laws, to be referred to as the Law of constant acceleration, and the Law of relative acceleration are in complete conformance with the principles of both, the time and energy theory, and the millennium theory of relativity.

The theory of natural motion reexamines the fundamental nature of the classical principles of uniform motion and acceleration. Specifically, it focuses on the area of physics commonly referred to as Newtonian mechanics as defined by Newton?s three laws of motion. Among the surprising findings are these: Uniform motion is not something an object does, but rather, a state that an object is in relative to other objects. And it is seen that this state is not only indistinguishable from, but in fact the same state as a state of rest. From this, it follows that acceleration is not actually a form of motion at all, but rather a force induced change of this motion state. In conclusion it is argued that Newton?s Laws of motion are not entirely correct even at the classical none relativistic level and thus require modification even at this level before such principles can be explored on the relativistic scale.