Enter the content which will be displayed in sticky bar
Jeffrey Joseph Wolynski
local time: 2024-03-28 22:32 (-04:00 DST)
Jeffrey Joseph Wolynski

Assumptions

Found: 11

2013-06-16 18:57:21
Planets are stars. They only look different because they are aging, some are old like the Earth, Uranus and Neptune, some are middle aged like Jupiter and Saturn, some are young like the Sun. This is the needed ockham razor for the star sciences so that clarification in communication can be attained. It is the world view that planetary formation and star evolution are mutually exclusive that has stalled the astrophysical sciences. They are not. Planet formation is star evolution. It takes a star to make something as large as the Earth, because the Earth IS a star, it is a 4.5 + billion year old star. It is a black dwarf. Jupiter and Saturn are brown dwarfs. Uranus and Neptune are blue dwarfs.
2013-06-20 07:32:50
Matter is not "stuff". That is a circular definition. It would be more appropriate to give matter a definition that is not circular. Matter is therefore anything that emits and/or reflects electromagnetism. This definition can be used in all sciences.
2013-06-20 07:41:26
There is no such entity as "the universe". No human has ever viewed the "universe". It is a construct that does not have meaning. As well, the "observable universe" is an oxy-moran. How is the universe (everything) observable? The concept of "universe" and "observable universe" have no scientific construct. The "universe" is everything at all times, in all places, ipso facto it can not be "observed". When humans look at the stars, they are not actually looking at them, because it takes light a considerable amount of time to travel to your eyes. You are always looking at what was. This meaning the Big Bang theory is complete nonsense.
2013-06-24 11:04:34
Pulsars are embryonic galaxies. They are galaxy seeds. When they grow up they become galaxies. This process involves complex thermodynamics and superconductivity, as they are the source of matter creation. Halton Arp and Harmbartsumian understood this before me.
2013-06-24 11:06:15
Stars are not the source of matter creation. They are giant dissipative events that give galaxies their appearance, like leaves to a tree.
2013-06-24 11:09:46
Supernovas and novas are not dying stars. They are something else entirely. They are more than likely new born pulsars or new born stars. As the name "nova" implies "new".
2013-06-24 21:39:31
Particle physics is 100% wrong. Magnetism, electricity, gravitation and all other phenomenon act at a distance, thus completely falsify the hypothesis of reality being made of discrete entities separated by space. This means that the Higgs Boson search was destined to find nothing of importance or relevance to reality since inception.
2013-06-25 08:52:34
Time is motion. There is no 4th dimension.
2013-06-25 08:58:30
Perpetual motion is a law of nature, widely demonstrated and experimentally proven. This is how satellites stay in orbit around the Earth. Why this law of nature is ridiculed and given knee jerk reaction is astounding. It is Newton's first law: "An object placed in a state of motion remains perpetually (uniformly) in that state of motion until changed by the action of an external force".
2013-06-29 10:33:59
Energy is matter. They are synonymous terms. There is no such thing as energy transfer, or energy becoming matter or matter becoming energy, there is only matter in motion.
2013-06-29 14:58:45
Reality is emergent phenomenon. It is not intrinsic as taught by particle physics mathematicians. There are no intrinsic particles at all, no "electron/proton/neutron/bosons/fermions". There are different "elements" but their differences are emergent, and not intrinsic based on the "number of electrons/protons" they consist of. There are no protons/electrons/neutrons as individual entities separate from reality, from themselves.