Enter the content which will be displayed in sticky bar
Ajay Sharma
local time: 2024-03-29 03:47 (-07:00 DST)
Ajay Sharma (Abstracts)
Titles Abstracts Details
  • Newton's Third Law: A Critical Analysis (2013) [Updated 1 decade ago]

    Newton's third law of motion have been quoted from the Philosophi Naturalis Principia Mathematica published in 1687. The law as in original form states that to every action there is always an equal and opposite reaction: or the forces of two bodies on each other are always equal and are directed in opposite directions.' The equality of action and reaction is unconditional or unrestricted or uninfluenced by external factors in the law i.e. equality holds good in all cases. This is discussed here at macroscopic level and some anomalous results are found due to characteristics of the processes. If two balls of cloth and rubber are thrown on the wall then reaction on rubber ball is more than that on cloth ball. According to third law of motion action and reaction has to be equal irrespective of the characteristics. The same can be tested in elastic collisions when target is very-2 heavy than projectile.


  • Is E=∆mc2 is Dathematically Derived or Speculated in Sep 1905 Paper (2013) [Updated 1 decade ago]

    The qualitative idea of mass energy inter-conversion may have existed before Einstein but quantitatively established it in Sep. 1905 paper. In this paper Einstein derived ∆L = ∆mc2 (light energy ? mass equation), it is not completely studied; and is only valid under special conditions of involved parameters. ∆E = ∆mc2 is obtained from ∆L = ∆mc2 by simply replacing L by E (every energy) without derivation. Here results are critically analyzed taking all possible variables in account. Under some conditions of valid parameters ∆L = ∆mc2 is not obtained e.g. sometimes result is Ma = Mb or no equation is derivable.If all values of all valid parameters are taken in account then the same derivation also gives L = α∆mc2, L = A∆mc2, where A is coefficient of proportionality. Thus Einstein's derivation under the valid parameters also predicts that energy emitted may be less or more than ∆E = ∆mc2. It may be confirmed in chemical phenomena ( the utmost sensitive and specific equipments), in bizarre cosmological and astrophysical phenomena (Solar flares, supernova, etc.). This theoretical and experimental analysis is significant in view of initial findings of neutrinos traveling faster than light in MINOS and OPERA experiments which support that speed neutrinos exceed the speed of light, c.


  • Einstein's Incomplete derivation of ∆L=∆mc2 or ∆E=∆mc2, Its Critical Analysis, and Applications of Generalized Form ∆E=Ac2∆m (2010) [Updated 1 decade ago]
    by Ajay Sharma   read the paper:

    Einstein?s Sep. 1905 paper in which ∆L=∆mc2 (light energy?mass equation) is derived, is not completely studied; and is only valid under HANDPICKED or SUPER -SPECIAL CONDITIONS. Here the origin of ∆E=∆mc2 is completely speculative in nature without mathematical derivation. This derivation (under general conditions) contradicts the LAW OF CONSERVATION OF MATTER. In simple words it implies that when candle burns its mass must increase. Apparently Einstein may had been aware of limitations and complexities of his derivation; hence he only took SUPER SPECIAL VALUES OF PARAMETERS. Thus Einstein derived ∆L=∆mc2 and speculated from it ∆E=∆mc2. The same derivation also gives L=∆mc2 or L=A∆mc2, where A is coefficient of proportionality. Thus Generalized Mass Energy inter conversion equation is derived in other way as ∆E=Ac2∆m , where A is coefficient of proportionality. There are numerous values of constants of proportionality in the existing physics. Then applications of ∆E=Ac2∆m are given to justify its validity.


  • Concepts of Mass and Energy Since Aristotle's to Einstein's Era (2009) [Updated 1 decade ago]
    by Ajay Sharma   read the paper:

    The concepts of mass and energy are extremely useful physical quantities. The study of these physical quantities has started since days of Aristotle or even before. G. Corolis made a significant breakthrough by defining work as W=F.S = FScos theta and derived kinetic energy equal to mv2/2. Newton initiated the discussion on inter-conversion of mass and light energy. Then various scientists such as S. Tolver Preston, Jules Henri Poincar?, Olinto De Pretto, Fritz Hasenohrl, Frederick Soddi, derived equation for inter conversion of energy before Einstein. Some of the scientists, who did significant work in this regard are least known. Then Einstein in 1905, derived light energy-mass equation (L = Dmc2 ) about which Newton had mentioned about two centuries before. Further from L = Dmc2 Einstein speculated more general equation without any specific derivation = Dmc2.


  • Ajay Sharma Rejustifies His Paper on the Generalization of E = mc2, Pointing Out Elementary Mistake's in Andrew George's Paper (2008) [Updated 1 decade ago]
    by Ajay Sharma   read the paper:

    To draw scientific Conclusions, the knowledge of the paper/topic and basic aspects of science is necessary.  But it has not been so in Prof. Andrew George's comments regarding Ajay Sharma's work on Einstein's Sep. 1905 paper.  Ajay Sharma has confirmed in various publications that Einstein's Sep. 1905 paper contradicts laws of conservation of matter under some conditions.  This aspect is justified here.


  • Is Einsteins E = mc2 Conceptually Applicable to Chemical Reactions? (2006) [Updated 1 decade ago]
    by Ajay Sharma   read the paper:

    Before applying any equation in any phenomena, we have to see the conditions and assumptions under which the EQUATION IS derived.  What have been the CONDITIONS and ASSUMPTIONS in the derivation of an equation?  It is very important to know these before applying the equation.  For example Hooke?s Law is only obeyed within elastic limits and Ohm?s Law is applicable only under certain conditions.


  • A Generalization Based on Quantitative Inadequacy of Archimedes Principle in Balloon Experiments (1997) [Updated 1 decade ago]
    by Ajay Sharma   read the paper:

    One consequence of Archimedes'' principle is that the mass which a balloon supports in a fluid is independent of the shape of the balloon and depends only upon its volume. For air-filled floating balloons in water some deviations from this result have been observed in first-stage experiments. The dependence of mass on the shape of the balloon which is supported in water has been clearly observed in various observations. It is evident from the first-stage experiments that for floating balloons the principle is only true for particular shapes. The deviations from the principle and contradictions can be explained if the definition of the principle is empirically modified i.e. it is assumed that the upthrust experienced by body is proportional to the weight of the fluid displaced. The constant of proportionality also accounts for shape of body and other relevant factors that were not accounted for by the principle.