Ether, the only Path to Unifying Cosmic Forces
I propose a new way of thinking about cosmic processes, one based more on the likeliest origin of forces in the cosmos, and based less on our observations of forces in our earth-surface environs (“quantum empiricism.”)
The intuitively-likeliest point of origin of cosmic forces would be Space. The type of space meant here would be Original Space, a type of space that would have existed prior to the first appearance of forces. Original space, therefore, would have not been like our present space. How could pure space have led to our kind of world – of cosmic forces, atomically-structured systems, and so on? -If original space was self-compatible – such that “point localities” were oscillating reciprocally and in perfect symmetry with each other – it could have led to our kind of world as follows.
At some point in time, a pair of adjacent “points” became oscillationally fatigued, and fell toward each other curvationally, in “Yin and Yang” fashion. (Oscillational fatigue is known to occur in metals, but since metallic oscillational fatigue is a quantum process, it cannot be definitively related to oscillational fatigue in original space.) (The reciprocity distance parameters of these “points” would not have been infinite, so the “points” would have been finite – not like mathematical “points.”) -As soon as the “disturbance” incurred by the point-pair broke the perfect symmetry of space, it would have been propagated throughout all of space, producing a new kind of matrix, featuring directionally-vibrational (as derived from the oscillational) energic-units that are elemental and identical. -This would represent a suitable underlying matrix for the development of the uniformity we find in our present world of atomic structures, and so on. Elemental etheric energy would be vibrational, resonational, and linear, from unit-to-elemental unit. -The resonance of two elemental vibrating ether units can be conceptualized as “nodes” forming loose connections (not “fixed” connections) with each other.
This kind of model could rationally explain the phenomenon of action-at-a-distance, which physics is calling “quantum entanglement” – a clever phrase, but, I submit, quantum mechanics does not really know what is going on here.
In 1935, Einstein took note of the early evidence for this phenomenon, and referred to it as being “spooky.” Because of it, he called into question the very foundation of quantum mechanics, an opinion he never changed. -Afterward, he occasionally used the term “ether,” but he never incorporated it into his relativity theories.
Using the ether model just described, a rationale would exist for action-at-a-distance. -When a pair of quantum-scale units are observed to react synchronously after one of the pair is tweaked, even though they are separated by distances that appear too great for quantum forces to be acting, what I propose is happening is that a second kind of force is acting.
On or near the earth, magnetic energy levels are higher than in space (In my model, earth’s magnetic field is more etheric. and stronger, than presently believed). Due to this magnetic energy, the underlying elemental etheric units are induced to “close up,” and form linear entrainments, which increases their resonances, forming larger energy units such as quantum scale units. Thus earth can be described as “quantized” compared to space. -These quantum units then can have other energic properties, such as spin, vectors, perhaps non-linearlity, and so on. But, since they are made up of the elemental ether units, the quantum units would also retain the ability to resonate with the underlying vibrating universal elemental ether matrix, which explains how two related quantum units still “feel” each other, across vast distances, in action-at-a-distance.
This ether model also can account for magnetic fields, which the standard model cannot do. -If an electric current is passed through a wire, a magnetic field is produced around the wire. -Physics now explains the electric current as being due to “flows of electrons” through the wire, but it cannot explain the associated magnetic field with this “electron flow” model.
With the ether model above, the current flow through the wire basically involves the transmission of energic impulses by elemental etheric units, with the increase of electrons being merely an “incidental” by product.=Inasmuch as elemental ether units mediate the current flow in the wire, and identical elemental ether units exist in the space around the wire, the magnetic field is simply the etheric units resonating with the ether units in space, “rebalancing” the forces in the neighborhood of the wire that were “unbalanced” by passing the current through the wire.
The kind of gravitation model gotten with this ether model would involve the concept that two bodies being attracted to each other each possess etheric “auras” in their spatial vicinity, that the space between the bodies consists of identical elemental ether units, and that all these ether units are resonating with each other, producing the attraction of the two bodies.
There is a possible field test designed to produce a selectively-etheric energy field, and to measure for a predicted decrease in the densities of materials in the test system. I got the design from an obscure independent source. -The cost of the test would be more expensive than I can afford.