Ether, the only Path to Unifying Cosmic Forces
I propose a new way of thinking about cosmic processes, one based more on the likeliest origin of forces in the cosmos, and based less on our observations of forces in our earth-surface environs (“quantum empiricism.”)
The intuitively-likeliest point of origin of cosmic forces would be Space. The type of space meant here would be Original Space, a type of space that would have existed prior to the first appearance of forces. Original space, therefore, would have not been like our present space. How could pure space have led to our kind of world – of cosmic forces, atomically-structured systems, and so on? -If original space was self-compatible – such that “point localities” were oscillating reciprocally and in perfect symmetry with each other – it could have led to our kind of world as follows.
At some point in time, a pair of adjacent “points” became oscillationally fatigued, and fell toward each other curvationally, in “Yin and Yang” fashion. (Oscillational fatigue is known to occur in metals, but since metallic oscillational fatigue is a quantum process, it cannot be definitively related to oscillational fatigue in original space.) (The reciprocity distance parameters of these “points” would not have been infinite, so the “points” would have been finite – not like mathematical “points.”) -As soon as the “disturbance” incurred by the point-pair broke the perfect symmetry of space, it would have been propagated throughout all of space, producing a new kind of matrix, featuring directionally-vibrational (as derived from the oscillational) energic-units that are elemental and identical. -This would represent a suitable underlying matrix for the development of the uniformity we find in our present world of atomic structures, and so on. Elemental etheric energy would be vibrational, resonational, and linear, from unit-to-elemental unit. -The resonance of two elemental vibrating ether units can be conceptualized as “nodes” forming loose connections (not “fixed” connections) with each other.
This kind of model could rationally explain the phenomenon of action-at-a-distance, which physics is calling “quantum entanglement” – a clever phrase, but, I submit, quantum mechanics does not really know what is going on here.
In 1935, Einstein took note of the early evidence for this phenomenon, and referred to it as being “spooky.” Because of it, he called into question the very foundation of quantum mechanics, an opinion he never changed. -Afterward, he occasionally used the term “ether,” but he never incorporated it into his relativity theories.
Using the ether model just described, a rationale would exist for action-at-a-distance. -When a pair of quantum-scale units are observed to react synchronously after one of the pair is tweaked, even though they are separated by distances that appear too great for quantum forces to be acting, what I propose is happening is that a second kind of force is acting.
On or near the earth, magnetic energy levels are higher than in space (In my model, earth’s magnetic field is more etheric. and stronger, than presently believed). Due to this magnetic energy, the underlying elemental etheric units are induced to “close up,” and form linear entrainments, which increases their resonances, forming larger energy units such as quantum scale units. Thus earth can be described as “quantized” compared to space. -These quantum units then can have other energic properties, such as spin, vectors, perhaps non-linearlity, and so on. But, since they are made up of the elemental ether units, the quantum units would also retain the ability to resonate with the underlying vibrating universal elemental ether matrix, which explains how two related quantum units still “feel” each other, across vast distances, in action-at-a-distance.
This ether model also can account for magnetic fields, which the standard model cannot do. -If an electric current is passed through a wire, a magnetic field is produced around the wire. -Physics now explains the electric current as being due to “flows of electrons” through the wire, but it cannot explain the associated magnetic field with this “electron flow” model.
With the ether model above, the current flow through the wire basically involves the transmission of energic impulses by elemental etheric units, with the increase of electrons being merely an “incidental” by product.=Inasmuch as elemental ether units mediate the current flow in the wire, and identical elemental ether units exist in the space around the wire, the magnetic field is simply the etheric units resonating with the ether units in space, “rebalancing” the forces in the neighborhood of the wire that were “unbalanced” by passing the current through the wire.
The kind of gravitation model gotten with this ether model would involve the concept that two bodies being attracted to each other each possess etheric “auras” in their spatial vicinity, that the space between the bodies consists of identical elemental ether units, and that all these ether units are resonating with each other, producing the attraction of the two bodies.
There is a possible field test designed to produce a selectively-etheric energy field, and to measure for a predicted decrease in the densities of materials in the test system. I got the design from an obscure independent source. -The cost of the test would be more expensive than I can afford.
Hi Michael,
Check out my writings on Osborne Reynolds’ Sub-mechanics of the universe and on an inversion of ideas as to the structure of the universe. I have posted them in archive.org and are available also on keelynet on the web.
Bruce Lamar Rosenberg
Bruce:
Your comments, and the invite to check your own model, are appreciated, although I think it would be more to the point if we were to take a few specific theoretic questions and compare our models in detail to see how they address each problem.
Again, your interest in my model is appreciated, and I’d welcome hearing from you again, especially if we were to get into some of the specifics.
This isn’t describing what your ether is made out of other than to describe them as ‘points’. I would agree that the ether is the starting point, but we can’t be that vague about it. My preferred embodiment is a positron/electron dipole sea – at least that is made out of particles that are known to exist.
Also, I think the whole quantum entanglement thing is about as complicated as taking a pair of gloves and then separating them a wide distance apart. When we look at one of the gloves and discover it to be left handed, we then look at the other glove to find it is right handed. No big mystery here, that result was inevitable and not due to any ‘communication’ between the gloves.
I don’t believe that magnetic fields can be accounted for as a ‘resonance’. Magnetic fields have the specific property of a vector direction and a magnitude. I don’t see how a resonance can represent a vector magnitude, but a dipole can represent such a vector magnitude for the magnetic field.
How, I believe the ether works is described by my paper:
http://vixra.org/pdf/1305.0075v1.pdf
Franklin,
I have been checking this Comment for a while, as to when it would get approved, but I guess David DeH. hasn’t gotten to it.
Just to let you know in case you thought i was ignoring it. (All that is given is the first few words”This isn’t describing what your ether is made of, other than….”)
Franklin:
I have given quantum-entanglement a deeper study, from the standpoint of my own ether model, so that from my perspective on the ether, it’s “from the horse’s mouth.” It’s a more detailed discussion of Q.E. than was in this Article.
So-called quantum entanglement is a real phenomenon, and represents radiated packets of etheric energy which have the same vibratory pattern. Elemental etheric units are the only actual participants in this phenomenon, with the quantum units walled-off, kinetically, like the cool arms of a quiet purring mechanism which can just turn itself on and off by itself, any time.
The logical extension of this model of quantum entanglement would be that all the phenomena we observe in our “quantized” setting at earth’s surface (“quantization” being a process brought on by the magnetic forces on our planet, compared to outer space where such magnetization is lacking) – light, gravitation, “quantum entanglement,” spontaneous human combustion, and others – all representing variations on a similar underlying aetheric theme. -Although these phenomena appear vastly different from each other as we observe them (which means after underlying aetheric vibrational forces have been altered by quantization to spin-vector quantum forces), nevertheless, they all arise from the same kind of process in the aether as radiated packets of aetheric energy , with the differences between the observed phenomena being due to variations in the vibratory patterns of the underlying aetheric radiations. As the variable aetheric vibratory patterns transition to spin-vector quantum forces, they manifest to us as very differentiated phenomena.
One important kind of variation in the vibratory patterns between different energy entities would be their relative vibratory rates. -For example, for two bodies having magnetic fields, the vibratory rates of the elemental ether units in their vicinity would be faster. Their etheric energy fields, or “auric” fields, would be relatively close in terms of their etheric vibratory rates, compared to the surrounding ether, which is un-magnetized. Compared to the “auric” zone between the two bodies, the spatial ether has a slower vibratory rate (less energized). -Thus, the similar vibratory patterns in the etheric auras of each solid body would make them more resonationally aligned, as their elemental etheric units resonate more closely.
In this ether model, elemental ether units are not physically cpontiguous, but they do become energically contiguous, as their outward vibrations form a resonant connection, between each elemental ether unit. This would tend to close what would otherwise be “gaps” between the elemental ether units between the two bodies. -This makes for a rational new model of gravitational attraction.
The way this kind of universal ether may have arisen would go as follows – The ether arose from original space, which was space prior to the first appearance of forces, thus it differed from our present space. -To lead to our world of forces, this original space must have had a property of self-compatibility, such that it self-oscillated, with elemental point=localities oscillating symmetrically and reciprocally with each other. -This led to oscillational fatigue, such that neighboring point-localities fell together in “Yin and Yang” fashion.
These Yin Yang point-pairs could not have been the future ether themselves, because they were combinational rather than elemental singleton units (see any of the classic depictions of the Yin and Yang.)
Step two in forming a universal ether would have been a reversible re-equilibration of the point-pairs with the initial oscillational setting. This would have broken the perfect symmetry of the elemental oscillatory point localities of original space. This would have led to in turn to a universal vibrational (as derived from the oscillational) ether, composed of vibrating dipolar (as their outward vibrations form connections with each other) energy units. -Then, linear entrainments of these elemental resonating units would have produced intense, etherically-super-refined foci of energy.
Intelligent creational design enters in also, to lead to our universe, after this point.
The above model of a universal ether affords a more rational view of linear (e.g. light and electronic) phenomena than does the standard model.
With the ether model, true linearity does not stem from quantum (spin/vector type) forces. What we observe at our quantum level of observation as “linear transmissions” actually represent linear resonances at an underlying etheric-matrix level. These linear transmissions then “up resonate” to the quantum level of observation.
True linearity only occurs at the elemental etheric level, where matching-sized units are in intimate proximity to be able to resonate (as they vibrate.)
Basically my ether model claims that, underlying our perceptible quantum atomically-structured world, there exists an unstructured ether matrix, containing a sea of elemental ether units. These elemental units were derived from a first-causal world composed of point-oscillational elemental “points.” The ether units derived from those first-world oscillations are vibrational, and, being elemental, are identical to each other. They form perfectly-linear resonations as their outward vibrations form connections with each other. (No spin, vectors, waves, or other non-linear mechanisms as with quantum-atomic forces.)
I claim that this is the only kind of model that can rationally account for quantum entanglement.