Decontamination of physics
Decontamination of physics
The three pillars of physics
Modern physics is based on the following basic concepts:
- Quantum mechanics, or QM.
- Special theory of relativity, or SRT.
- General theory of relativity, or GRT.
Since light is not observable, we must draw conclusions about light from matter, in the form of electrons, exposed to light. We use electrons as discrete detectors and we see a stream from a photo detector, quantized into electrons. Our detectors create quantization, although quanta not necessarily must exist in light. Planck’s constant is an electron property – not a light property.
The idea that quanta exist in light is also supported, in error, by observations on radiation from hydrogen. This radiation does not contain the primary frequencies, defined by electrons in long time stability. However, interferences are observable as differences in these primary frequencies. The current explanation to this phenomenon is that electrons are radiating only when they are jumping between states with long time stability. However, this explanation is pure magic and not plausible, since there is no on/off switch on the electron and therefore electrons cause continuous radiation. A more reasonable explanation is found in the well-known wave property of destructive superposition. All electrons in a specific state radiate at the same frequency and are also sensitive to that frequency. This means that they can organize their phases to minimize radiation. The result is an extremely low radiation.
We can therefore conclude that a well-known light property easily can explain hydrogen radiation, without the need to assume an on/off switch on the electron. This means that we have no arguments for assuming quanta in light and energy. QM is wrong. QM is also in conflict with the locality principle by predicting spooky action at a distance with no time delay. The fact that discrete energy levels appear in our idealized model does not automatically hinder continuous variations of energy in nature.
Quantization seems to be needed instead in an ether model explaining ether and quantum gravity, that was presented by Fatio. This model has been abolished on false grounds due to lack of aberration. However, no aberration can be explained by the fact that gravity does not move1, but is instead emerging inside matter due to effects of the ether wind. So, gravity does not move and produces therefore no aberration.
SRT is based on a mistake in 1882 by an introduction of an effect of transverse ether wind in the reference arm in the test equipment used by Michelson and Morley. They compared the ether wind effects in two interferometers oriented in a right angle to each other. It was stated that light must take a longer way due to transverse ether wind. This idea is in conflict with the wave model stating that flat wave fronts have fixed orientations in the equipment. This follows from the fact that a collimator generates fixed wave fronts and a telescope detects fixed wave fronts. In both cases wave front orientations are defined by mirrors and transverse ether wind cannot tilt wave fronts in coherent systems. This means that light does not take a longer way due to transverse ether wind in the reference arm in the equipment. The 1882 mistake was in conflict with the wave model for light and the transition from light in the form of particles to the form of waves was not completed correctly.
This means also that wave front tilting is not present in stellar aberration either. This aberration is caused by observer motion instead.
Since no ether wind effect exists in the reference arm, we no longer have motivation for time dilation and Lorentz transform. So, we must instead use the Galilean transform. SRT is wrong. We no longer have to assume multiple time concepts and individual aging.
Bending of a one-dimensional line demands at least a two-dimensional surface. Bending a two-dimensional surface demands a three-dimensional space. Bending of three-dimensional space in the same sense is not possible, since we have not four dimensions in space. We cannot solve this problem by regarding time as a space-dimension. This idea is stupid nonsense. The talk of space bending is not real but instead bending of surfaces in space.
GRT was introduced as an act of despair, since Fatio’s quantum gravity2 was abolished on false grounds and mathematics then became considered as a part of physics. In error, it was assumed that gravity should move like light and therefore demonstrate aberration. However, gravity does not move at all1. Instead, gravity emerges inside matter as an effect caused by the ether wind. Gravity is therefore explained very well by Fatio’s model for quantum gravity. GRT is wrong.
Newton’s law of gravity is derived mathematically, based on Kepler’s laws for planetary motions. Newton did not observe that his mathematics demands bodies with perfect spherically symmetric forms. So, his law is not valid in physics with aspherical bodies. To make the law more generally valid we must modify the law and we can do that by applying the law to small volume elements and then do an integration over volume. After doing that we can see that unification with Fatio’s mechanism now is possible. This model consists of neutrino-like ether particles, moving with high speed in all directions. Since matter is absorbing a very small amount of these particles the flow is slightly reduced and this is creating an asymmetry in the flow and this asymmetry is causing a radial ether wind. This radial ether wind is the cause of gravity.
GPS (the global positioning system) is said to confirm SRT and GRT. However, the effect in the GPS system is only a few centimeters in positional error. However, a larger effect is found in the subsystem of the atomic clocks. This effect is a constant increase of clock frequency when satellites are put into orbits. SRT predicts an effect from speed and GRT predicts an effect from gravity potential. So, two effects are added to each other and this sum is corrected for in the GPS system.
Instead of these two effects we can find the same correction based on one theory, assuming an ether wind, v. The effect on clock frequency is proportional to (1-v2/c2). Instead of speed itself in SRT we use ether wind due to the same speed. Instead of gravity potential in GRT we use the radial ether wind equal to the escape velocity of 11.2 km/sec near Earth and decreasing with range, so clock frequency is increasing with range due to GRT and this effect is dominating over the effect of opposite sign from SRT.
Radial ether wind
The radial ether wind, v, from the Sun of 42.2 km/sec at 1 AU (astronomical unit) from the Sun is decreasing (1/r1/2) with range. Therefore, 2-way light speed, proportional to (1-v2/c2), is increasing with range, and can therefore simulate a decreasing space station speed. ExplainingPioneer anomalyas an illusion due to ether motion.
A falling ether near a celestial body is moving towards the source on a body causing a blue shift in the ether frame. Since the ether is moving away from the observer the observer will see a red shift. Together these two effects cause a second order red shift. Explaining Big Bang as an illusion due to ether motion.
We find that classical physics can explain observed phenomena, if we give up QM, SRT and GRT. We therefore find that:
- Abolishing QM means avoiding the magical concept of entanglement.
- Abolishing SRT means avoiding the magical concept of multiple time concepts.
- Abolishing GRT means avoiding the magical concept of curvature of emptiness.
Quantization is not needed in light and in energy on Planck level, but needed in Fatio’s quantum gravity on a level defined by neutrino-like ether particles defining the reference for light speed, and causing the force of gravity to emerge inside matter.
The Pioneer anomaly and the Big Bang anomaly are both illusions caused by ether motions.
A decontamination of physics is needed, and three very important errors must be corrected. These problems are mainly caused by our bad understanding of the wave model for light. The transition from light particles to light waves is not finished. One important error is not observing that in coherent systems only ether wind component longitudinal to light is relevant for light behavior according to the wave model. An ether wind component falling inside the plane of the wave fronts is not observable with coherent (phase based) technology, and must be disregarded in such systems. Detailed descriptions of these ideas are found in 3 and 4, where the distinction between ray and beam is analyzed.
This indicates that we do not understand the wave model, and therefore we try to explain light behavior by tricky ideas based on particles. So, particles in light are just illusions and not needed. We need particles only in the case when we discuss the ether concept as Fatio did.
1 J. E. Persson, Accessible at https://www.gsjournal.net/Science-Journals/Essays/View/9227
2 Pushing Gravity: New Perspectives on Le Sage’s Theory of gravitation, edited by M R Edwards (C Roy Keys, Montreal 2002)
3 J. E. Persson, Phys. Essays 34, 211 (2021).
4 J. E. Persson, Phys. Essays 35, 1 (2022).