Enter the content which will be displayed in sticky bar
John Erik Persson
  • Home
  • Affiliates
    • Community
  • Login
  • Register

Explaining Illusions, or Finding Paradoxes

John Chappell Natural Philsophy Alliance > John Erik Persson > Aether > Explaining Illusions, or Finding Paradoxes

Explaining Illusions, or Finding Paradoxes

Mar 12, 2016John-Erik PerssonAether, Relativity, Uncategorized4 Comments

David and Nick are right regarding ‘critical thinking’ as a better concept than ‘dissident physics’. However, it is not enough to use a better term. When we have found a paradox we become more convincing if we can trace the error back to its origin. How did the illusion arise? Nick has done a good work on the paradox but not explained the illusion of time dilation.

The irrelevance of transverse ether wind

In coherent systems, like interferometers and telescopes, the normal to the wave fronts is the observable direction of light and is independent of ether wind blowing inside the wave fronts. A transverse ether wind changes real motion of a light beam but not the observable orientation of wave fronts inside that beam. In MMX standing waves have wave fronts always parallel to defining mirrors and light speed is always c along the optical axis in relation to the ether. We can see this by realizing that in resonators light takes the fastest, not the shortest way between mirrors. Therefore, we get no effect in transverse arm in MMX and no effect in Einstein s light clock. The factor GAMMA, or square root of 1-v^2/c^2, is an illusion. Stokes made this mistake by using spherical wave fronts in MMX instead of plane fronts. A very important mistake, that Einstein copied and used in relation to time dilation. The GAMMA factor is an illusion. Time dilation is an illusion. The traditional interpretation of MMX according to Stokes has been wrong for more than 100 years without being observed. This is explained in detail in my article called The Radial Ether Wind. See Fig 2 in that article. The irrelevance of transverse ether wind means also that stellar aberration is useless in relation to the ether wind.

Einstein produced so many errors that he obscured the fact that Stokes made the first one, and Einstein just copied a very important error. If we want to detect the real direction of light motion we must use focused light and base the detection on amplitude, and not on phase. In coherent systems, based on phase, only one component in the ether wind is relevant and that is the longitudinal component, transverse to the wave fronts.

The dilation of atomic clocks

In atomic clocks orbiting electrons move forwards and backwards in relation to the ether wind. During each orbiting period the electron is accelerated and decelerated by the ether wind. Due to a very small difference between these two effects we get a clock frequency in proportion to 1-v^2/c^2. This means that the behavior of the atomic clocks in the GPS system is a dilation of clocks, not a dilation of time. We can explain clock behavior in GPS by one cause, instead of as an effect of SRT plus GRT. This dilation of clocks is described in my articles called Light without Energy and The Falling Ether.

The ether

Since scientists accept black matter and black energy it is very remarkable that they still deny black ether. Since we abolish time dilation we also must abolish contraction of space. Instead we need contraction of physical objects and this can explain MMX as a useless method, due to a compensating effect. A radial ether wind can explain gravity and the Pioneer anomaly as well. The ether wind changes the length of a meter defined by light to the same amount as the length of the mechanical standard in Paris.

The ether wind can also explain the bending of light near our sun. This effect is not caused by transverse ether wind, but is instead due to a gradient in the longitudinal ether wind. An ether wind constituted by particles explains gravity if it is directed in radial direction. Normally bodies in free fall move in such a way that ether wind and gravity from other bodies are zero. However, there is one exception during a solar eclipse. The Moon is shielding the gravity from the Sun on only parts of our planet. Therefore, it is possible to detect a small difference in the shielding on a small body in relation to an averaged effect on our planet in the point where that body is. Such effects have been detected vertically in a gravimeter and horizontally in a radio tower. This explains also why these indications are bipolar. See The Falling Ether.

John-Erik Persson

CNPS blog

GSJournal page

CNPS personal page

 

 

 

Written by John-Erik Persson

Explaining Illusions, or Finding Paradoxes (4)

  1. Nick Percival March 13, 2016 at 3:51 pm

    The above article brings up the good point about not explaining the illusion of time dilation. Elsewhere, but not in my recent blog entries here, I note that the Twin Paradox and many other Special Relativity paradoxes and contradictions have there origin in the 2nd Relativity Principle (the constancy of the speed of light). This Principle and assumption was the base for the logic that Einstein used to derive his Twin Paradox claim. The error was not the prediction of a net proper time difference, but rather that this asymmetric, physical effect was due to the SR’s inherently symmetric time dilation.

    Reply ↓
  2. Cornelis Verhey March 17, 2016 at 1:47 am

    I would suggest that ether does not have a wind at all. Ether is a solid in which the tension varies. At some point the tension will become great enough the ether tensile strength will weaken.
    If the tension propagates in longitudinal waves then even though the wave motion is back and fort the average tension will decrease where the wave density is greatest (since higher wave density implies weaker ether tensile strength). This means that all other wave patterns that also occupy space will move slower in the regions of higher tension (weaker ether tensile strength). Fundamentally this means the gravity is a gradient in the tensile strength of the ether (solid). Because of the lower tensile strength the frequency of atomic clock oscillations that are dependent on the tensile strength of the ether will run slower in regions of stronger gravity (higher wave density). Matter is concentrations of highly self resonant wave patterns in the ether that result from waves being bent towards regions of higher wave density. You will recognize this as a positive feedback system since higher wave density causes waves to bend towards the area of weaker tensile strength which in turn cause the tensile strength to weaken more ect. ect. ect. So in short gravity is a warp in ether tension which cause the rate of atomic clock events to change. Gravity is a warp in space (ether) that causes the rate at which atomic events occur to change (time). Warp in space-time.

    Cornelis Verhey

    Reply ↓
  3. John-Erik Persson March 21, 2016 at 7:52 pm

    Nick
    I have demonstrated in THE RADIAL WTHER WIND that Stokes was wrong by stating an effect in the transverse arm in MMX and also that Einstein was wrong by stating an effect of transverse ether wind in a light clock. See that article. What is your opinion about my statement that transverse ether wind is irrelevant in coherent systems? Do you have any comments on my ideas?
    Best regards from
    John-Erik

    Reply ↓
  4. John-Erik Persson March 21, 2016 at 8:05 pm

    Cornelis
    The ether wind is the difference between observer’s state of motion and the state of motion of the ether. I have stated that standing waves defined by mirrors in resonators and in interferometers always are parallel to these mirrors and therefore always move with the speed c in relation to the ether in a direction orthogonal to the mirrors. See my comments to Nick above. Have you any comments to my ideas in the article? Is there anything that you cannot accept?
    Best regards from
    John-Erik

    Reply ↓

Leave a Reply

Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

← The Illusion of Dilation of Time
Disprove Einstein →

Affiliations

The John Chappell Natural Philosophy Society The Natural Philosophers Community

Recent Posts

  • Mathematics is powerful and dangerous
  • Decontamination of physics
  • Gravity does not move!
  • The illusion of time dilation, Big Bang and Pioneer anomaly
  • Did stellar aberration give us individual aging?

Archives

  • September 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • April 2022
  • August 2021
  • March 2021
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • January 2019
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • May 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • June 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • March 2015

Categories

  • Aether
  • Directors
  • Gravity
  • Light
  • Mathematics
  • Members
  • Philosophy
  • Physics
  • Relativity
  • Space-Time
  • Time
  • Uncategorized
  • Wave Particle Duality
© Copyright - 2013 : All Rights Reserved.
Powered by WordPress & Designed by Aivahthemes
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Dribbble
  • LinkedIn