Enter the content which will be displayed in sticky bar
John Erik Persson
  • Home
  • Affiliates
    • Community
  • Login
  • Register

The MMX question

John Chappell Natural Philsophy Alliance > John Erik Persson > Uncategorized > The MMX question

The MMX question

May 10, 2020John-Erik PerssonUncategorized0 Comment

The wave front and the mirror

Due to the irrelevance of the ether wind in relation to mirrors wave fronts in MMX are conserved in equipment frame, and mirrors are conserving wave fronts, as stated in the MEMO to the NPA conference in 2009. This has been defined in different ways, but, since the important MMX tests are done with resonators, a specific derivation related to this test form can give a new version of this proof.

Since light travels many times between the resonator mirrors, wave fronts that are not really parallel to the mirrors become more and more out of phase after each round trip. This means destructive superposition, and according to Huygen’s principle, constructive superposition is real only for wave fronts parallel to the mirrors. Or, fastest are winning. So, beam width inside the resonator is reduced, and remaining wave fronts are therefore defined by mirrors and independent of illumination. This means that wave fronts are conserved in equipment frame for modern MMX tests in the same way as in original MMX. In both cases this means that there is no effect of the ether wind in the transverse arm.

The ether

The forces linking atoms in crystal must move between atoms with speeds related to the ether just like how forces in light move between mirrors. Therefore, the contraction of matter is equal to the reduction of 2-way speed of light. The effect in the longitudinal arm is therefore compensated. This effect is, in both cases, proportional to (1-v2/c2), but the effect in atomic clocks, moving forth and back in one dimension of 2, is only half this effect namely proportional to (1-v2/2c2). The difference by 2 fooled scientists to assume Lorentz invariance instead of the correct Galilean invariance.

Stellar aberration

The ether wind cannot rotate a wave front, since all points on the wave font are changed equally. Transforming a moving wave front from the frame of the Sun to the frame of the Earth changes wave front orientation, and explains stellar aberration independent of the ether wind.

Conclusion

No effect of an ether wind is observable in stellar aberration and in both arms of the MMX equipment. In the transverse arm the wave model was infected by a particle-based idea that mirrors control particle motion instead of wave front orientation. This mistake was hidden by time dilation but this produced instead the twin paradox and the wave-particle paradox. Therefore, Planck’s constant could be regarded as quanta of light instead of as quanta of electron charge. The quantization, demonstrated by Bohr to be real in the hydrogen atom, was, in error exported to light.

Written by John-Erik Persson

Leave a Reply

Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

← The Michelson-Morley question — and the ether
MEMO to CNPS conference 2020 about waves →

Affiliations

The John Chappell Natural Philosophy Society The Natural Philosophers Community

Recent Posts

  • Mathematics is powerful and dangerous
  • Decontamination of physics
  • Gravity does not move!
  • The illusion of time dilation, Big Bang and Pioneer anomaly
  • Did stellar aberration give us individual aging?

Archives

  • September 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • April 2022
  • August 2021
  • March 2021
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • January 2019
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • May 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • June 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • March 2015

Categories

  • Aether
  • Directors
  • Gravity
  • Light
  • Mathematics
  • Members
  • Philosophy
  • Physics
  • Relativity
  • Space-Time
  • Time
  • Uncategorized
  • Wave Particle Duality
© Copyright - 2013 : All Rights Reserved.
Powered by WordPress & Designed by Aivahthemes
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Dribbble
  • LinkedIn